Agree, but explain that they are in a position to disagree with the doctor’s recommendation
By choosing this option, I am able to give my friend and informant what he has asked for in terms of help but I still am able to express my opinion about what I think is a viable alternative. By leaving the ultimate decision up to him, I value his reasoning and remain humble in terms of expressing my opinion- as well as engaging in potentially beneficial reciprocity. But am I really choosing the most beneficial response for all concerned? What about my own ethical guide?
What about the values at risk here?
Respect for Persons Beneficence Justice My Decision |
Respect for persons:
By agreeing to drive, I am supporting the autonomy of the community members and respecting the decision to engage with the doctors in a biomedical intervention. If the choice to go to the hospital is made freely, ethically, I should support it, regardless of what I think myself. However, if my friends in the community have been convinced by the doctor to take on unnecessary travel and medical expenses, helping them might actually not be supporting their self-determination. Instead, it may be supporting their lessening autonomy in the birth process and their increased surveillance by biomedical practitioners. Hopefully, my discussion with them will address this violation and provide them with information and support to challenge their doctor should they choose to do so.
This choice benefits me as a researcher in that I am able to agree to provide a service for a family that has assisted me greatly with my research. I will likely be considered to be generous and kind. Personally, I benefit through being able to share my opinion. |
What do you think?